The Cast of Good Vibes

Measuring What Matters - Proving the Value of Internal Communications in 2026

Vaughan Reed - Founder of Vibe.fyi Season 4 Episode 1

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 11:04

Internal communications teams are under pressure to prove real business impact in 2026. Success is increasingly defined not just by engagement metrics but by whether communications actually reach employees, are understood, align people with strategic priorities, and lead to measurable behavioral change. Many teams still rely on easy-to-get engagement data (like open rates and views), creating a credibility gap versus what leaders value most — outcome-based evidence that shows internal comms is driving real organizational results.

Why Engagement Isn’t Enough

SPEAKER_01

We are looking at this uh massive report from ActionHQ. It's called Measuring What Matters.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and before we get into the weeds, I think it's important to talk about the scope here.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Right. Because this isn't some casual survey.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Not at all. We're talking about data from over 280,000 employees across North America. And the key thing is it skews toward these really complex, dispersed workforces, hybrid, frontline heavy.

SPEAKER_01

So if you're listening and thinking my company's too messy for this, well, this report is actually looking right at you.

SPEAKER_00

It's built for the messiness.

SPEAKER_01

So what's our mission with this deep dive then? What's the one problem we're trying to get to the bottom of?

SPEAKER_00

We're trying to bridge the credibility gap. Internal comms teams, let's just call them IC, they are working harder than ever, but they're really struggling to prove that their work actually moves the needle on the business. Okay. The conflict is this the industry is still stuck measuring engagement clicks, views, that kind of thing. But leaders, they're demanding impact, actual behavior change.

SPEAKER_01

Okay. I have to pause on that. Yeah. Because engagement has been the holy grail for what, a decade? If I send an email and 90% of the company opens it, I'm celebrating.

SPEAKER_00

And you should be. But it's a trap. It's a vanity metric.

SPEAKER_01

A vanity metric.

SPEAKER_00

Because it's visible, it's easy to track. You get a nice dashboard with green arrows pointing up. It feels good. But leaders, especially CFOs, they're getting smarter. They know that an open doesn't mean someone read it or understood it or cared.

SPEAKER_01

Like clicking like on an article you haven't actually read just to look smart. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Precisely. You're signaling participation, not comprehension. And the report nails this. It says engagement is a starting point, not a destination. It just doesn't translate to application.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell That is such a critical distinction. An output question versus an outcome question.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Exactly.

Defining Success Beyond Clicks

SPEAKER_01

So if we're moving past clicks, where are we going? The report lays out four more mature definitions of success: reach, understanding, alignment, and behavioral change.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

Let's zoom in on understanding and alignment. Yeah. Those feel harder to pin down.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell They are. And this is where the real shift happens. Understanding isn't about volume anymore. It's not how many words you send. It's can an employee explain the key message back to you?

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell In their own words.

SPEAKER_00

In their own words. That's a high bar.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell It requires testing, not just tracking.

SPEAKER_00

It does. And then alignment takes it even further. This is about an employee connecting their daily job, whether they're writing code or driving a truck to the big picture company vision.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell So IC stops being just a distribution function like a post office.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Yes, a glorified post office. And it becomes the fulsion that creates cohesion that makes sure everyone is rowing in the same direction. In 2026, if you aren't aligned, you're drifting, and drifting is expensive.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell But and there's always a but this is all happening in what the report calls the operating environment of 2026. And reading through it, it just sounds exhausting.

SPEAKER_00

It's challenging. The report basically says we are in a permanent state of attention scarcity. This isn't a phase. This is just the new normal, an attention recession.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell The whole noise versus signal problem. But why is it so much worse now?

SPEAKER_00

It's the sheer volume and variety of the noise. You're not just competing with other work emails. You're fighting against Slack, Teams, news alerts, social media, just total tool fatigue.

SPEAKER_01

So employees are already mentally drained before they even see your message.

SPEAKER_00

Their cognitive batteries are in the red. They are actively looking for reasons to ignore you.

SPEAKER_01

That's a terrifying thought. And right on cue, enter AI. You'd think that would be the magic bullet.

Attention Scarcity And AI Trust

SPEAKER_00

You would think. But it's a real double-edged sword. Yes, the benefit is speed, efficiency. You can version a newsletter for five different teams in seconds. But the risk, and the report is very clear on this, is a massive erosion of trust.

SPEAKER_01

Because it feels generic. People know a bot wrote it.

SPEAKER_00

Employees are smart. They can smell a mass-produced generic email from a mile away. If leadership is using a bot to talk about something like culture, it feels performative. It feels like they didn't care enough to write it themselves.

SPEAKER_01

Become soulless.

SPEAKER_00

Completely. And the report's nuance is that AI cannot and should not replace the human dimension. Judgment, context, ethics, figuring out what really matters to people. That still takes a human.

SPEAKER_01

So AI is a drafting tool, not a strategy tool.

SPEAKER_00

Perfect way to put it. And all this is happening while resources are tight, expectations are going up, more channels, more impact, but budgets and headcount, not so much.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Do more with less.

SPEAKER_00

The mantra of our time.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, let's talk about the absolute foundation of all this. The report has this line: there is no communication without reach. Which seems so obvious. It does, but you'd be shocked. Why is this still such a big deal? Why are we struggling to just reach people in 2026?

SPEAKER_00

Because the workplace is so fragmented now. The report shows this huge equity gap with frontline and deskless workers. We're talking about people in manufacturing, logistics, healthcare. Exactly. Or they have device restrictions on the factory floor. Or they just don't have a digital identity in the system. They clock in and they clock out. They aren't logging into an intranet.

SPEAKER_01

That seems like a massive blind spot.

The Reach Gap For Frontline Teams

SPEAKER_00

It's an inclusion issue. That's how the report frames it. If you can't reach them, you're denying them context. You're basically creating a two-tier workforce. The informed class at their desks and the uninformed class on the front line.

SPEAKER_01

And that just breeds resentment.

SPEAKER_00

It does. One size fits all is dead, buried. You have to be intentional. You have to go where they are. Break room screens, manager huddles, mobile apps, you can't expect them to come to you.

SPEAKER_01

Which brings us to another huge topic in the report. Repetition. Now, when I hear that word, I just think of spam. Nagging.

SPEAKER_00

And that's the wrong way to do it, for sure. If you just send the same email five times, you train people to ignore you. But the data shows repetition is critical for retention. We're talking a seven to nine importance rating out of ten.

SPEAKER_01

Because complex messages just don't land the first time.

SPEAKER_00

They don't. The brain needs to see information multiple times to really absorb it.

SPEAKER_01

So what's the right way to do it without being annoying?

SPEAKER_00

It's all about multi-channel reinforcement. The core message, the what and the why, stays the same, but you vary the delivery.

SPEAKER_01

The same song, just a different remix.

Repetition Without The Spam

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Monday, it's a short video. Wednesday, it's a visual on a digital screen. Friday, it's a talking point in a team meeting. And this is the most critical part. You use your managers. It's non-negotiable. A message from the CEO is corporate news. A message from my direct boss is my reality. My boss is the one who can connect that big corporate message to my work right now.

SPEAKER_01

So the job isn't just talking to employees, it's equipping managers to have those conversations.

SPEAKER_00

100%. If you aren't building toolkits for your managers, you are bypassing your most influential communication channel. Period.

SPEAKER_01

Okay. So reach, repetition, managers.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Which leads us to what the report calls the holy grail, behavioral change.

SPEAKER_00

This is it. This is what the C-suite actually cares about. This is the strongest proof of value, rated eight to ten in importance. Success isn't what people know, it's what people do.

SPEAKER_01

Knowledge without action is just trivia.

SPEAKER_00

It is. We're talking about people adopting a new tool, following a new safety rule, changing a habit.

SPEAKER_01

There's this one quote in the report that I loved. The distinction between ROI and what was it?

SPEAKER_00

Return on experience. It's brilliant. ROI shows what you delivered. We delivered a training program. Great. Return on experience shows what actually changed for the employee. Did their work get easier? Did accidents go down?

SPEAKER_01

I love that. Return on experience. Because if nobody changes how they work, the return is zero. It's just a cost.

SPEAKER_00

And they have a case study that proves this. A company was trying to get employees to adopt a new digital tool.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_00

They didn't just send an email. They did the whole multi-channel manager-led reinforcement campaign. The result, they drove adoption rates from 42% to 93%.

SPEAKER_01

Let's just sit with that number. 42 to 93%. That is the difference between a failed project and a wild success.

Managers As The Prime Channel

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell That is a number you can take to the CFO. That isn't we sent a nice newsletter. That is our communication strategy drove a business outcome. That justifies your budget.

SPEAKER_01

And here's the irony, right? This the report points out that while everyone agrees this is the most valuable metric, it's the least tracked one by IC teams. Why?

SPEAKER_00

It's the measurement gap. It's a structural problem. The data on behavior software adoption, safety incidents, employee retention. That data doesn't usually live with the communications team.

SPEAKER_01

It's an HR system or operations or IT.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. So the comms team doesn't have the keys to the data vault that actually proves their value.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell So they're being judged on the only data they can access, which is the vanity metrics.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell And that leads to this KPI's paradox, as the report calls it. Right. Leaders say they want outcomes, but when it comes to performance reviews, the IC team is still being measured on activity, open rates, page views, how many posts they publish.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell So your boss says prove alignment, but your bonus is tied to getting a 50% open rate.

SPEAKER_00

It's a total disconnect. And the risk is huge. If IC teams can't speak the language of impact, they'll always be seen as a cost center, and cost centers get cut.

Behaviour Change And ROI vs ROX

SPEAKER_01

So the way out of this is to build those bridges, to go to the other department heads and connect the dots.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell That's the whole move toward data impact. It's about partnership. Going to the head of sales and saying, let's work together, I'll run a campaign for your launch, and you share the sales data so we can see what worked.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Shifting the conversation from how many people read it to did it work?

SPEAKER_00

Yes. That's the whole game right there.

SPEAKER_01

This has been a lot, but it feels like there's a really clear roadmap. What are the big takeaways for someone listening to this feeling that pressure right now?

SPEAKER_00

I think there are three things you have to get right in 2026. First, reach must be designed. It's an inclusion decision. You have to solve for your deskless workers.

SPEAKER_01

Can't leave them behind.

SPEAKER_00

Second, repetition is a discipline. Stop spamming. Start reinforcing your message across different channels. And third, leadership reinforcement is non-negotiable. Your managers are your most important channel.

SPEAKER_01

And please stop counting clicks as the end goal.

SPEAKER_00

Please. Engagement is the handshake. It's not the deal. It's just the start of the conversation.

SPEAKER_01

You know, that brings up a final thought for me. We're in businesses that measure everything by outcome. Sales measures revenue, not calls made. Manufacturing measures yield, not machine uptime.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_01

So if every other part of the organization is measured by its outcome, why is communication still so often measured by its output?

Partnering For Data And Impact

SPEAKER_00

That's the million dollar question, isn't it? Is it finally time to stop counting clicks and start counting actual conversations?

SPEAKER_01

If you can answer that, you close the credibility gap. You stop being the newsletter person.

SPEAKER_00

And you become the strategy person.

SPEAKER_01

Well, plenty to think about there. If you want to see that full data impact model, definitely check out the source material from ActionHQ. It's a gold mine.

SPEAKER_00

Absolutely. Well worth the read.

SPEAKER_01

Thanks for diving in with us today. Until next time, keep asking the hard questions.